Electrode comparison

E316L vs E410

E316L is the molybdenum-bearing austenitic filler for chloride service; E410 is a hardening martensitic filler for wear and 410 base metal.

E316L vs E410 at a glance

E316LE410
AWS specification AWS A5.4/A5.4M AWS A5.4/A5.4M
Process Stick (SMAW) Stick (SMAW)
Form Covered electrode Covered electrode
Tensile strength (min) 70 ksi 75 ksi
Yield strength (min) 40 ksi 55 ksi
Elongation (min) 30% 20%
Impact toughness Not required; austenitic deposits remain tough at low temperature Not required; properties depend heavily on post-weld heat treatment
Polarity DCEP, AC DCEP, AC
Positions Flat, Horizontal, Vertical, Overhead Flat, Horizontal, Vertical, Overhead
Penetration Shallow to medium Medium
Deposition rate Medium Medium
Coating / core Lime-titania (-16) Lime or lime-titania
Slag Self-lifting, remove completely between passes Moderate, releases readily
Shielding gas None — self-shielding None — self-shielding
Storage Dry storage; rod oven at 250–300 °F (120–150 °C) after opening. Dry storage and a rod oven at 250–300 °F (120–150 °C) after opening — hydrogen cracking is a real risk with martensitic deposits.
Primary use Marine and offshore stainless fabrication Repair and joining of 410 martensitic stainless components

Which should you use?

E316L is chosen for corrosion resistance in chlorides and deposits a ductile austenitic weld that needs no heat treatment. E410 is chosen for hardness and for matching 410 base metal, and it deposits a martensitic weld that air-hardens and must be preheated and tempered. They overlap only in the sense that both are called stainless; in practice the choice is decided by whether the part needs corrosion resistance or wear resistance.

Choose E316L when

  • Marine, chemical and chloride exposure
  • Type 316 and 316L base metal
  • Joints that cannot be heat treated

Choose E410 when

  • Type 410 base metal with heat treatment available
  • Hardfacing pump sleeves, valve seats and shafts
  • Mildly corrosive service where wear dominates

Amperage compared

DiameterE316LE410
3/32 in (2.4 mm)40–80 A40–80 A
1/8 in (3.2 mm)65–110 A70–110 A
5/32 in (4.0 mm)95–150 A100–150 A
3/16 in (4.8 mm)130–190 A130–190 A

Ranges are typical starting points. Diameters listed for only one electrode are shown as — for the other.

E316L vs E410 — common questions

Is E410 more corrosion resistant than E316L?

No. At 12% chromium and no molybdenum, E410 offers far less corrosion resistance than E316L, particularly in chlorides.

Can E316L be used as a hardfacing overlay?

It is not a hardfacing alloy — its deposit is soft and ductile. It is used for corrosion-resistant cladding, which is a different job from wear surfacing.

Does E316L require post-weld heat treatment?

Normally no. Austenitic deposits do not harden on cooling. Solution annealing is occasionally specified for severe corrosion service, but it is not routine.

Full specifications

Other comparisons