Electrode comparison

E308L vs E410

E308L is an austenitic 304-matching filler that needs no heat treatment; E410 is a hardening martensitic filler for 410 base metal and wear surfaces.

E308L vs E410 at a glance

E308LE410
AWS specification AWS A5.4/A5.4M AWS A5.4/A5.4M
Process Stick (SMAW) Stick (SMAW)
Form Covered electrode Covered electrode
Tensile strength (min) 75 ksi 75 ksi
Yield strength (min) 45 ksi 55 ksi
Elongation (min) 35% 20%
Impact toughness Not required; austenitic deposits stay tough to cryogenic temperatures Not required; properties depend heavily on post-weld heat treatment
Polarity DCEP, AC DCEP, AC
Positions Flat, Horizontal, Vertical, Overhead Flat, Horizontal, Vertical, Overhead
Penetration Shallow to medium Medium
Deposition rate Medium Medium
Coating / core Lime-titania (-16) Lime or lime-titania
Slag Self-lifting, brittle, must be removed completely between passes Moderate, releases readily
Shielding gas None — self-shielding None — self-shielding
Storage Keep dry. Stainless coatings pick up moisture and cause porosity and worm tracks. Dry storage and a rod oven at 250–300 °F (120–150 °C) after opening — hydrogen cracking is a real risk with martensitic deposits.
Primary use Food, dairy and beverage equipment Repair and joining of 410 martensitic stainless components

Which should you use?

These are different classes of stainless entirely. E308L deposits an austenitic 19Cr-10Ni weld: ductile, tough, non-hardening, easy to weld and corrosion resistant in general service. E410 deposits a 12% chromium martensitic weld that hardens in still air, needs preheat and post-weld tempering, and can exceed 40 HRC as welded. E410 exists for matching 410 base metal and for wear overlays; it is not an alternative filler for 304 work.

Choose E308L when

  • Type 304 and 304L fabrication
  • Anywhere post-weld heat treatment is impractical
  • Corrosion service without wear requirements

Choose E410 when

  • Type 410 and 12% chromium base metals
  • Wear-resistant surfacing
  • Applications where a hard deposit is the objective

Amperage compared

DiameterE308LE410
3/32 in (2.4 mm)40–80 A40–80 A
1/8 in (3.2 mm)65–110 A70–110 A
5/32 in (4.0 mm)95–150 A100–150 A
3/16 in (4.8 mm)130–190 A130–190 A

Ranges are typical starting points. Diameters listed for only one electrode are shown as — for the other.

E308L vs E410 — common questions

Can E410 weld 304 stainless?

It is the wrong choice. The martensitic deposit has lower corrosion resistance than 304 and requires heat treatment the 304 assembly probably will not receive.

Why does E410 need preheat when E308L does not?

E410's deposit transforms to hard, brittle martensite as it cools through the transformation range. Preheat and controlled cooling slow that transformation enough to avoid cracking. Austenitic E308L does not transform at all.

Which is more corrosion resistant?

E308L, in most environments. Its higher chromium and nickel give far better general corrosion resistance than a 12% chromium martensitic deposit.

Full specifications

Other comparisons