Electrode comparison

E308L vs E309L

E308L matches 304 base metal; E309L is over-alloyed so it survives dilution when welding stainless to carbon steel.

E308L vs E309L at a glance

E308LE309L
AWS specification AWS A5.4/A5.4M AWS A5.4/A5.4M
Process Stick (SMAW) Stick (SMAW)
Form Covered electrode Covered electrode
Tensile strength (min) 75 ksi 75 ksi
Yield strength (min) 45 ksi 45 ksi
Elongation (min) 35% 30%
Impact toughness Not required; austenitic deposits stay tough to cryogenic temperatures Not required by the specification
Polarity DCEP, AC DCEP, AC
Positions Flat, Horizontal, Vertical, Overhead Flat, Horizontal, Vertical, Overhead
Penetration Shallow to medium Shallow to medium
Deposition rate Medium Medium
Coating / core Lime-titania (-16) Lime-titania (-16)
Slag Self-lifting, brittle, must be removed completely between passes Self-lifting, must be fully removed between passes
Shielding gas None — self-shielding None — self-shielding
Storage Keep dry. Stainless coatings pick up moisture and cause porosity and worm tracks. Dry storage, rod oven after opening — same discipline as E308L.
Primary use Food, dairy and beverage equipment Joining austenitic stainless to carbon or low-alloy steel

Which should you use?

Chemistry decides this one. E308L is a nominal 19Cr-10Ni deposit that matches Type 304 base metal. E309L runs richer at 23Cr-12Ni, deliberately over-alloyed so that when carbon steel melts into the puddle and dilutes the deposit, enough chromium and nickel remain to hold a crack-resistant austenitic-ferritic structure. Use E308L on stainless-to-stainless joints and E309L whenever carbon steel is on one side or you are laying the first layer of an overlay.

Choose E308L when

  • Welding 304 or 304L to itself
  • Sanitary and food-grade stainless fabrication
  • Cost-sensitive stainless work where dilution is not an issue

Choose E309L when

  • Stainless to carbon or low-alloy steel
  • Buffer layers under a stainless overlay
  • Repairing steels of unknown composition

Amperage compared

DiameterE308LE309L
3/32 in (2.4 mm)40–80 A40–80 A
1/8 in (3.2 mm)65–110 A65–110 A
5/32 in (4.0 mm)95–150 A95–150 A
3/16 in (4.8 mm)130–190 A130–190 A

Ranges are typical starting points. Diameters listed for only one electrode are shown as — for the other.

E308L vs E309L — common questions

What happens if you use E308L on a stainless-to-carbon-steel joint?

Dilution from the carbon steel side drops the chromium and nickel content of the deposit into a martensitic range. The weld becomes hard and brittle and commonly cracks.

Can E309L be used on a 304-to-304 joint?

Yes, and it will make a sound corrosion-resistant weld. It simply costs more than E308L with no benefit on a matching joint.

Do both have the same amperage range?

Practically, yes. Both run 65–110 A on a 1/8 in rod, DCEP, and both need roughly 10–15% less current than a carbon steel rod of the same diameter.

Full specifications

Other comparisons