Electrode comparison

E308L vs ER308L

Same 19Cr-10Ni low-carbon chemistry. E308L is a flux-covered stick electrode; ER308L is bare wire or rod for MIG and TIG.

E308L vs ER308L at a glance

E308LER308L
AWS specification AWS A5.4/A5.4M AWS A5.9/A5.9M
Process Stick (SMAW) TIG (GTAW) / MIG (GMAW)
Form Covered electrode Solid wire / rod
Tensile strength (min) 75 ksi 75 ksi
Yield strength (min) 45 ksi 45 ksi
Elongation (min) 35% 35%
Impact toughness Not required; austenitic deposits stay tough to cryogenic temperatures Not required; austenitic deposits stay tough to cryogenic temperatures
Polarity DCEP, AC DCEP (GMAW), DCEN (GTAW)
Positions Flat, Horizontal, Vertical, Overhead Flat, Horizontal, Vertical, Overhead
Penetration Shallow to medium Medium
Deposition rate Medium Medium to high depending on process
Coating / core Lime-titania (-16) None — bare wire or rod
Slag Self-lifting, brittle, must be removed completely between passes None; a light oxide film should be brushed or pickled off
Shielding gas None — self-shielding 100% argon for TIG; tri-mix 90% He / 7.5% Ar / 2.5% CO2 for spray MIG
Storage Keep dry. Stainless coatings pick up moisture and cause porosity and worm tracks. Keep clean and dry. Contamination, not moisture, is the main enemy for bare stainless filler.
Primary use Food, dairy and beverage equipment Sanitary tube and pipe welding for food, dairy and pharma

Which should you use?

The alloy is effectively the same — both are low-carbon 19Cr-10Ni fillers for Type 304 and 304L, with ER308L held to a slightly tighter 0.03% carbon maximum against E308L's 0.04%. The difference is entirely process. E308L is a covered electrode: portable, works in wind, leaves slag that must be chipped between every pass. ER308L is bare: no slag, cleaner welds, far better control, and the only sensible choice for sanitary tube, thin material and anything where the weld will be inspected or polished.

Choose E308L when

  • Field repair on stainless with no gas available
  • Thick sections and heavy fabrication
  • Windy conditions

Choose ER308L when

  • Sanitary tube, food and pharmaceutical piping
  • Thin sheet and tube
  • Welds that will be polished, inspected or left visible
  • Root passes where a back purge is used

Amperage compared

DiameterE308LER308L
3/32 in (2.4 mm)40–80 A
1/8 in (3.2 mm)65–110 A
5/32 in (4.0 mm)95–150 A
3/16 in (4.8 mm)130–190 A
0.030 in (0.8 mm) MIG50–150 A
0.035 in (0.9 mm) MIG70–180 A
0.045 in (1.2 mm) MIG100–250 A
1/16 in (1.6 mm) TIG40–90 A
3/32 in (2.4 mm) TIG70–130 A
1/8 in (3.2 mm) TIG100–180 A

Ranges are typical starting points. Diameters listed for only one electrode are shown as — for the other.

E308L vs ER308L — common questions

Is the weld metal the same?

Essentially, though ER308L is held to a slightly lower carbon maximum. In service both give the same corrosion resistance on 304 base metal.

Which produces a cleaner weld?

ER308L. With no flux there is no slag to trap between passes and no slag residue to remove, which matters a great deal on sanitary and inspected work.

Do both need a back purge?

On pipe roots, yes. Sugaring is caused by oxygen reaching the hot unshielded root, and that happens regardless of which process laid the pass.

Full specifications

Other comparisons