Electrode comparison

E316L vs E347

E316L fights chlorides with molybdenum; E347 fights sensitization at high temperature with niobium. The service environment picks the winner.

E316L vs E347 at a glance

E316LE347
AWS specification AWS A5.4/A5.4M AWS A5.4/A5.4M
Process Stick (SMAW) Stick (SMAW)
Form Covered electrode Covered electrode
Tensile strength (min) 70 ksi 75 ksi
Yield strength (min) 40 ksi 45 ksi
Elongation (min) 30% 30%
Impact toughness Not required; austenitic deposits remain tough at low temperature Not required by the specification
Polarity DCEP, AC DCEP, AC
Positions Flat, Horizontal, Vertical, Overhead Flat, Horizontal, Vertical, Overhead
Penetration Shallow to medium Shallow to medium
Deposition rate Medium Medium
Coating / core Lime-titania (-16) Lime-titania (-16)
Slag Self-lifting, remove completely between passes Self-lifting, remove fully between passes
Shielding gas None — self-shielding None — self-shielding
Storage Dry storage; rod oven at 250–300 °F (120–150 °C) after opening. Dry storage; rod oven at 250–300 °F (120–150 °C) after opening.
Primary use Marine and offshore stainless fabrication High-temperature piping and exhaust systems

Which should you use?

These electrodes solve different corrosion problems. E316L's molybdenum resists pitting and crevice attack in chlorides at ordinary temperatures — seawater, salt spray, process chemicals. E347's niobium prevents intergranular attack after long exposure in the 800–1500 °F range, which is a high-temperature problem. If the part runs hot, E347. If the part sits in salt, E316L. Where both apply, the specification will name a grade such as 316Ti or a stabilized molybdenum-bearing filler rather than asking you to choose.

Choose E316L when

  • Marine and chloride exposure
  • Type 316 and 316L base metal
  • Chemical and pharmaceutical process equipment

Choose E347 when

  • Type 321 and 347 base metal
  • Exhaust, refinery and high-temperature piping
  • Parts that will see long service between 800 and 1500 °F

Amperage compared

DiameterE316LE347
3/32 in (2.4 mm)40–80 A40–80 A
1/8 in (3.2 mm)65–110 A65–110 A
5/32 in (4.0 mm)95–150 A95–150 A
3/16 in (4.8 mm)130–190 A130–190 A

Ranges are typical starting points. Diameters listed for only one electrode are shown as — for the other.

E316L vs E347 — common questions

Which has better corrosion resistance overall?

Neither — they resist different attacks. E316L is better against chlorides and pitting; E347 is better against intergranular attack after prolonged high-temperature exposure.

Can E347 be used in seawater?

It has no molybdenum, so it pits in chlorides much as a 304-grade filler does. For seawater, E316L or a higher alloy is the appropriate choice.

Do both resist sensitization?

E347 does so permanently through niobium stabilization. E316L relies on low carbon, which slows sensitization but does not eliminate it over long high-temperature exposure.

Full specifications

Other comparisons