Electrode comparison

E7018 vs E7024

E7024 deposits far faster but only flat and horizontal; E7018 works all positions and is the low-hydrogen rod codes require.

E7018 vs E7024 at a glance

E7018E7024
AWS specification AWS A5.1/A5.1M AWS A5.1/A5.1M
Process Stick (SMAW) Stick (SMAW)
Form Covered electrode Covered electrode
Tensile strength (min) 70 ksi 70 ksi
Yield strength (min) 58 ksi 58 ksi
Elongation (min) 22% 17%
Impact toughness 20 ft·lb at -20 °F (27 J at -29 °C) Not required by AWS A5.1 for this classification
Polarity DCEP, AC AC, DCEP, DCEN
Positions Flat, Horizontal, Vertical, Overhead Flat, Horizontal fillet
Penetration Medium Shallow
Deposition rate High Very high
Coating / core Low-hydrogen potassium with iron powder Iron-powder titania, roughly 50% iron powder
Slag Heavy, brown-glassy, releases cleanly when run correctly Very heavy, usually peels off in one strip
Shielding gas None — self-shielding None — self-shielding
Storage Low-hydrogen rods must be kept dry. Hermetically sealed until opened, then held in a rod oven at 250–300 °F (120–150 °C). Dry room-temperature storage; no oven required.
Primary use Structural steel erection, bridges and buildings Long horizontal fillet welds on heavy plate

Which should you use?

Both are 70 ksi electrodes, and both use iron powder — but E7024 carries roughly 50% iron powder against E7018's smaller addition, which makes it the fastest-depositing common stick rod. The price is position: the 2 in E7024 restricts it to the flat position and horizontal fillets, and its shallow penetration means it cannot be used for a root pass. E7018 covers all positions, is low hydrogen, and carries a toughness requirement. On a positioned production fillet E7024 will fill the joint in far less time; anywhere else E7018 is the rod.

Choose E7018 when

  • Any out-of-position work — vertical or overhead
  • Code work requiring low hydrogen
  • Root passes and joints with variable fit-up

Choose E7024 when

  • Long flat or horizontal fillets on heavy plate
  • Production work where deposition rate drives cost
  • Filling large flat groove welds quickly

Amperage compared

DiameterE7018E7024
3/32 in (2.4 mm)70–120 A100–145 A
1/8 in (3.2 mm)110–165 A140–190 A
5/32 in (4.0 mm)150–220 A180–250 A
3/16 in (4.8 mm)200–275 A230–305 A
7/32 in (5.6 mm)260–340 A285–375 A

Ranges are typical starting points. Diameters listed for only one electrode are shown as — for the other.

E7018 vs E7024 — common questions

Can E7024 be used vertical?

No. The 2 in the classification limits it to the flat position and horizontal fillets. The large fluid puddle sags out of position.

Is E7024 low hydrogen?

No. It is a rutile iron-powder electrode. E7028 is the high-deposition rod that is also low hydrogen, and it is rated for flat and horizontal fillets.

How much faster is E7024?

Substantially — the heavy iron-powder coating puts far more metal per inch of rod into the joint, and it is dragged at high travel speed. On long horizontal fillets that difference dominates the cost of the weld.

Full specifications

Other comparisons