Electrode comparison

ER70S-6 vs E71T-1

ER70S-6 is solid wire with no slag and a cleaner finish; E71T-1 is flux-cored, deposits considerably faster and penetrates deeper on thick plate.

ER70S-6 vs E71T-1 at a glance

ER70S-6E71T-1
AWS specification AWS A5.18/A5.18M AWS A5.20/A5.20M
Process MIG (GMAW) Flux-Cored (FCAW)
Form Solid wire Tubular wire
Tensile strength (min) 70 ksi 70 ksi
Yield strength (min) 58 ksi 58 ksi
Elongation (min) 22% 22%
Impact toughness 20 ft·lb at -20 °F (27 J at -29 °C) 20 ft·lb at 0 °F (27 J at -18 °C); -1J and -1M grades extend this to -20 °F
Polarity DCEP DCEP
Positions Flat, Horizontal, Vertical, Overhead Flat, Horizontal, Vertical, Overhead
Penetration Medium, varies strongly with gas and transfer mode Medium to deep
Deposition rate High, continuous feed with no stub loss Very high — roughly twice the rate of a comparable stick electrode
Coating / core None — bare solid wire, often copper coated for feedability and contact Rutile flux core inside a mild steel sheath
Slag None; silicon islands float to the surface and are brushed off Fast-freezing rutile slag that supports the puddle out of position and peels readily
Shielding gas 75% argon / 25% CO2 (C25) 100% CO2 or 75% argon / 25% CO2
Storage Keep spools dry and covered. Bare wire rusts, and rusty wire means porosity and feed problems. Keep dry. The flux core absorbs moisture through the seam of the wire, and damp wire means porosity and hydrogen cracking.
Primary use General fabrication and shop welding on carbon steel Structural steel fabrication and erection

Which should you use?

Both run on the same machine with the same gas, both deposit 70 ksi weld metal, and both need shelter from wind. The difference is what the wire is made of. Solid ER70S-6 leaves no slag, gives a tidy bead and costs less per pound — ideal for sheet, light plate and anything where cleanup time matters. Tubular E71T-1 carries flux inside, so it deposits at a considerably higher rate, penetrates deeper at the same current, and its fast-freezing slag supports the puddle for genuine all-position welding at high amperage. On plate over about 1/4 in, flux core usually wins on throughput.

Choose ER70S-6 when

  • Sheet metal and thin plate
  • Work where no slag cleanup is a real advantage
  • Lower wire cost on high-volume light fabrication
  • Automotive and cosmetic welds

Choose E71T-1 when

  • Plate over about 1/4 in
  • Structural fabrication and heavy equipment
  • All-position welding at high deposition rates
  • Joints needing deeper penetration

Amperage compared

DiameterER70S-6E71T-1
0.023 in (0.6 mm)30–90 A
0.030 in (0.8 mm)50–180 A
0.035 in (0.9 mm)70–220 A90–250 A
0.045 in (1.2 mm)120–320 A150–350 A
0.052 in (1.4 mm)180–400 A
1/16 in (1.6 mm)200–450 A

Ranges are typical starting points. Diameters listed for only one electrode are shown as — for the other.

ER70S-6 vs E71T-1 — common questions

Is flux core stronger than solid MIG wire?

Both deposit 70 ksi class weld metal on carbon steel. Flux core penetrates deeper and fills faster, which suits thick plate, but neither is inherently stronger on a properly designed joint.

Can I run both on the same machine?

Yes, on DCEP with the same CO2 or 75/25 gas. Change to knurled drive rolls for the tubular wire and lengthen the contact tip to work distance.

Which produces more fume?

E71T-1, by a clear margin. Flux-cored processes generate noticeably more fume than solid wire, so ventilation matters more.

Full specifications

Other comparisons